Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Heard Stadium


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:16, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Raymond Heard Stadium

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails GNG, Non-notable Stadium, lacks any sources for any of the claims given. Previously marked as needing references/notability by another user. Caffeyw (talk) 08:16, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:43, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:43, 30 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete—Constructed in 1976, so non-routine coverage predates Google, but searching revealed nothing except WP:ROUTINE coverage of events being held there. Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 18:14, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 7 September 2013 (UTC)


 * weak Keep I'm not sure that this is as major a sports venue as some, but given the dates, we should not delete, in the expectation that further information will be found.  DGG ( talk ) 19:33, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per DGG. Ejgreen77 (talk) 00:45, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment—I don't understand. If something is old, it is exempt from WP:N?  If something is old, we assume that it was covered in WP:RS that just aren't available online?  Am I missing some new policies?   Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 13:00, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.