Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raynard Jackson (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There seems to be a new consensus that the sources found by Nfitz are enough to keep, so I'll boldly (and hopefully not recklessly) close right here right now. (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:07, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Raynard Jackson
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable political advisor per WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. KidAd (talk) 02:06, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:36, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:36, 10 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment Just at a glance, there is sufficient coverage on him. eg this and this and perhaps he writes too (if this is the same person). Also would note it appears his page wasn't really developed since the last AfD. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 23:40, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Is Raynard Jackson being canceled because he is a black conservative? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.174.116.49 (talk) 23:24, 12 June 2020 (UTC) }
 * Delete: Does not pass any notability criteria such as WP:GNG] or ANYBIO.  Not enough reliable sources available for a BLP. --  Otr500 (talk) 08:25, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Political advisors aren't inherently notable. Lefcentreright  Discuss   00:40, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
 * No subject is inherently notable -- WP:NRVE explicitly states this. It follows that inherent notability is not a requirement of WP:GNG. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 17:25, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - this article has been here a decade, and no one person supported the previous AFD. But suddenly he gets international attention for supporting Trump, and there's suddenly a surge to delete? Easily meets GNG one, three, four. Nfitz (talk) 02:09, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - keep for the reasons stated in my comment above, and the sources I provided, and per Nfitz. Individual meets WP:GNG. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 17:27, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets GNG per sources provided by Nfitz. Article needs improvement, not deletion. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs )~ 21:17, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes GNG --02:16, 18 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.