Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Razanne


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 15:35, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Razanne

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article reads as advertisement, has had a "no references" tag since 2009. Notability is not established. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:09, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, because it is an article I originated and I do not like to have articles I started deleted. But, as a matter of fact, I myself had forgotten all about the toy until brought back to my attention by this. As far as it sounding like advertisement, I never stooped that low. In fact I've placed the advertisement tag on som e articles myself. Antonio A tempo slow Martin 23:25, 12 August, 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. This toy has received lots of substantial coverage. Most are paywalled, but the news button in this nomination gave me several. Here's one, another, another, another, another, and another. There's more news sources then this, with some in different languages. Also note the book sources, too. Seems to me like a WP:BEFORE failure.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 22:48, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:37, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:37, 12 August 2013 (UTC)


 * 'Delete - Reads like advertisement, lacks any references, and links online all appear to be promotional in nature. Caffeyw (talk) 09:40, 14 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - The current state of the article has no bearing on the notability of the subject. The sources presented by Taylor Trescott show that significant coverage does exist to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 17:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - As per Taylor Trescott. Easily meets WP:GNG. CooperDB (talk) 15:22, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.