Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Razavipoor paradox


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. joe deckertalk to me 16:30, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Razavipoor paradox

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete. Original research, unsupported by significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. Sources include blogs, Facebook, and Wikipedia. PROD removed by article creator, who appears to be author of the subject of the article.  Cind. amuse  08:33, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 4 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete, not notable, and the ISBN on the 2007 book doesn't appear to be a real ISBN. Hairhorn (talk) 16:56, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I couldn't find coverage in reliable, independent sources, and the references provided appear to be self-published. The "paradox" is nothing but an amusing one-liner. Cullen328 (talk) 17:19, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.