Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Razerpak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:32, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Razerpak

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article has had zero reliable sources for over 10 years, and there's nothing online that could help it establish notability. No significant coverage in reliable sources - the only source used here that is considered reliable, Gamasutra, doesn't even mention this mod at all. Namcokid 47  (Contribs) 20:07, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:10, 27 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Zero reliable sourcing available. Nothing on WP:VG/RS's searchs. No general Google news hits at all. One of five possible book hits that covers cheating is denoted as being sourced from Wikipedia. Utterly fails WP:GNG. The article itself has a bad promotional bent as well. -- ferret (talk) 20:12, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 11:53, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. The only source I could find was Razerpak Clan on Twitter. Banned servers, bad gateways, no go. Fails WP:GNG -- Whiteguru (talk) 09:17, 4 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.