Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Razia, Boros Archangel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate wasDelete....mmmm...Ravnica crap rare :-)... Voice of All  T |@| Esperanza   22:47, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Razia, Boros Archangel
What is this? An RP character? I can't tell. Delete, anyway. &hearts;&hearts;purpl e  feltangel  &hearts;  &hearts;  00:51, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Apparently a card from Magic: The Gathering. One of thousands of cards, and not a very notable one. Article appears to be little more that a text copy from the card, so the might just be the possibility of copyvio there, but I don't want to be the one to open that can of worms. Delete (without any kind of merging or redirecting whatsoever) Saberwyn 04:38, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Would it be possible to consider Juzam Djinn and Mahamoti djinn (articles by the same user with the same level of detail as Razia, Boros Archangel) in this deletion as well, or would I have to nominate them seperately? Saberwyn 04:48, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I'd nominate them separately. -- Grev -- Talk 05:35, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Done. Articles for deletion/Mahamoti djinn and Articles for deletion/Juzam Djinn. Saberwyn 05:47, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete via Power Nine precedent. (In a nutshell: The nine most famous cards of Magic are good enough for one combined article.  No single card, therefore, gets its own.) -- Grev -- Talk 05:35, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete does not satisfy notability criteria in Fiction. - Dglynch 05:41, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Grev jnothman talk 07:12, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. per nom--  Dak ota  08:06, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep all schools, I mean Magic Cards Sorry got confused - DELETE--Nicodemus75 09:17, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete pointless to keep, someone might look at the other things this user did also, about everything he added is worth deleting. Boneyard 16:08, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete NN Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] 21:38, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, per the Black Lotus precedent. No single Magic card should get its own article. Andrew Levine 01:10, 4 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.