Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Razib Khan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Razib Khan

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

There are insufficient notable secondary sources that describe the subject of this article. Most of the notable sources describe the event with the New York Times, but that single event is not notable. Most of the individual's notability comes from his own publications, but Wikipedia requires notable secondary sources. Waters.Justin (talk) 14:25, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Biology, Bangladesh,  and California. Skynxnex (talk) 14:48, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  15:59, 22 March 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep There appear to be several secondary sources (books and articles) already cited in the story. Entirely separate from coverage the New York Times incident, notable RS already cited include Regalado (MIT Technology Review), Gonyea (NPR), Walker, Cussins, Rieland, and Newton. There's also Dunbar-Ortiz, page 43, which could be added. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * As Mr. Razib Khan is a global researcher, published too many research papers and coauthor of several books, owned a identity in google scholar or like other renowned research publisher (Find several secondary sources: Google (books · news · scholar etc) and also got remarkable citation against his publication. For this why his biographical story can be include for getting information by others through a common platform like wikipedia. As per WP:ACADEMIC WP:SCHOLAR Article may need to remove from deletion list to keep this in wikipedia. Thanks -
 * Md. Giashuddin Chowdhury (talk) 20:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.