Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Razik Zarook


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  03:47, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Razik Zarook

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Nominating for deletion because I do not believe the sources within this article meet our notability guideline for biographies. Sources available do not discuss the article subject in significant depth. Coverage is routine. No evidence of significant coverage over a sustained period of time. Most sources within are primary. The Bloomberg source is just a profile, per NCORP such standard profiles are generally not counted towards notability for corporations and for the same reason I do not consider this one source to constitute notability for this otherwise non-notable lawyer. Entire article is written like a resume and whiffs of self-promotion. Was de-prodded without reason by the creator of the article (who has disclosed they are paid to edit Wikipedia) without any reason. MaxnaCarta (talk) 01:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:49, 5 May 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:38, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MaxnaCarta (talk) 01:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Sri Lanka. Skynxnex (talk) 03:42, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Requires significant coverage - noting the Chairman of the Insurance Regulatory Commission of Sri Lanka, Ambassador and High Commissioner roles are not automatically notable. All the references are merely mentions in passing. Dan arndt (talk) 01:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.