Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RazorCMS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 01:12, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

RazorCMS

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

Promotion for non-notable software product. Author has COI issue. Was not able to find any significant third-party coverage, and article gives none. Haakon (talk) 14:49, 15 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete No sources, no article. Miami33139 (talk) 16:09, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is an an open source content management system, unlikely to ever be a household name.  Google News gives one sourceforge link in Japanese, and that's it. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per google failure. Polarpanda (talk) 16:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 21:30, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Why?: Never going to be a household name?, like quick, pivot, pluck, their not house hold names but there allowed??, can't find significant coverage?, there is plenty of links into the razorCMS site, around 980 at last count, it comes on first page of google for flat file cms search, COI??, no not at all, just bringing to light this software, goggle failure??, what are you talking about, I never created this article I just edited it, so please get your facts right, how could this be a conflict of interest if I never started it. Why not try helping people to correct there issues if they do really exist instead of just going DELETE DELETE DELETE, or is this place destined to be like DMOZ, and you will all no what i mean, I used to be an editor there. I guess if you want to delete then go right ahead, I will not waste time and effort playing your games, go right ahead delete the listing if you must. 192.93.164.23 (talk) 08:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC)smiffy6969192.93.164.23 (talk) 08:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC) 07:49, 16 December 2009 (GMT)
 * Delete. One link in Japanese to Sourceforge does not cut it.  The rambling directly above is giving me a headache.  JBsupreme (talk) 07:30, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * What?. One link in Japanese to sourcefourge, what the hell are you on about, rambling above giving you a headache, take some tablets, you know what, I get 3% traffic from here, go ahead rip it down, from razorCMS lead dev... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.93.164.23 (talk) 07:46, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Haakon (talk) 14:10, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Where, Who, and How? Just to get them out of the way. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:42, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I meant to come back and delete this non notable software a while ago after I tagged it. still not notable. 16x9 (talk) 22:32, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.