Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Razorfunfish


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. CSD G11 by User:LadyofShalott. Lankiveil (speak to me) 07:51, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Razorfunfish

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable WP:NEOLOGISM. Prod tag removed/challenged.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 02:24, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  --  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined  /  C ) 02:24, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete as self-admitted protologism. --ThaddeusB (talk) 02:27, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:MADEUP. Cnilep (talk) 02:30, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - not even a protologism, just something madeup yesterday. Wikipedia does not exist to give some made-up garbage google hits. Lady  of  Shalott  02:58, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, I wonder if this can be G11 deleted as blatant promotion? Lady  of  Shalott  03:21, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Note I tagged the article for G11 deletion rather than deleting myself so that at least one other admin would look at it. Foxy Loxy deleted it per the G11 rationale. The article was recreated, and speedily deleted again by Mentifisto. I won't SALT yet, but recommend it if the article is created a third time. Lady  of  Shalott  04:18, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hear hear: delete and salt per Lady's cogent argument. Drmies (talk) 04:41, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Done - Created a third time. Deleted a third time. Sprinkled liberally with SALT. Lady  of  Shalott  04:53, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.