Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reşit Inceoğlu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 07:14, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Reşit Inceoğlu

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

It appears that this was being curated on the Turkish Wikipedia in the sandbox of the same user just like here, but was nuked before it made its way into the mainspace. Together with the Commons file, I have concerns regarding a conflict of interest.

I don't see any criteria of NPROF this person meets. While no hard limit exists, an h-index of 8 is way too low to pass the guideline: neither is being one of the founders of a department within a faculty sufficient. None of his other academic positions are significant positions (associate professor, department vice dean, professor).

This means that the other way for the subject to be notable is with sources through the GNG, so we need multiple reliable and independent sources covering the person significantly. Majority of the sources are his own publications and are from institutions he has worked for/with. Out of the 11 right now, only 3 are independent. The Hürriyet source from 2002 would be good, but it only has a passing mention of İnceoğlu and a quote of him regarding the surgery, which isn't in-depth coverage about him. Biyografya is just a site that repeats other sources, so while it generally isn't a problem to cite it, it doesn't affect notability. I can't find much about the book cited, it doesn't have an ISBN and I cannot know how much coverage it has. However, the lack of any other sourcing, including other books, leads me to believe it isn't much, and even if it was a lot, it would be the sole source.

There are not enough reliable, independent and significant sources about the subject for it to satisfy the GNG, nor does the person pass the criteria listed in its respective SNG. Styyx (talk) 19:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Turkey. Styyx (talk) 19:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi thanks a lot for the detailed evaluation! I think that he does meet the criteria for notability in academics due to his research and publication of articles with evidence reaching over 750 citations. The real h index is much higher based on the statistics on google scholar. Also he has significant contributions to the medical field by books and research and publications. As well there is no conflict of interest nor is there evidence of one so that is not an issue. Also the subject has received significant media coverage from newspapers because of his impact in the field. Kemaltekin (talk) 03:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Relisting comment: This AfD was cut short by a WP:G7 author-requested deletion. At Deletion review/Log/2024 February 20, there was no consensus about whether this was appropriate given concerns of gaming the system, and as a result, this AfD is restarted. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   08:57, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears to be a worthy and admirable physician, but not enough for notability. Xxanthippe (talk).
 * Speedy delete as A7. Tehonk (talk) 04:09, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of notability (according to Wikipedia's criteria). There's possible COI as the creator's most edits up to this point revolve around the subject. Aintabli (talk) 05:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello, I see you have deleted the page under G7 while the AfD was going on. Could you restore it and re-delete if needed with the summary linking here? Otherwise this is basically evading the AfD process. Styyx (talk) 13:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete per nom.—Alalch E. 13:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete agree with others about lack of notability. Ldm1954 (talk) 23:36, 3 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.