Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Re-creation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 03:30, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Re-creation

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Little more than a dictionary definition and utterly devoid of references. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:09, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:Dictionary. If you want to make a distinction from reenactment, do it on the page for reenactment and redirect to there. Illinois2011 (talk) 04:28, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:00, 27 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  15:59, 3 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Basically a dictionary entry. North8000 (talk) 16:04, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No way around it, falls afoul of WP:NOTDIC. Mark Arsten (talk) 08:30, 4 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to reenactment. 218.250.159.25 (talk) 11:49, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. We are not a dictionary.--Epeefleche (talk) 23:58, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.