Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReGeneration (documentary film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The Bushranger One ping only 08:20, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

ReGeneration (documentary film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Documentary that doesn't seem to meet notability guidelines per WP:MOVIE. The IMDB page does exist but only links to one critic review, at CultureCatch.com (which doesn't have a WP page but is cited often.) I realize the relative importance of the names apparently involved in this film, but the sole review makes it sound like the work of an independent filmmaker with ancillary use of the people of note. Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:52, 11 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep (without prejudice). This is a relatively young article, and a cursory search shows that there are sources out there covering the film, so it appears to meet WP:GNG. Now, if some time goes by and the sources just aren't showing up, I'd be willing to revisit this discussion. —C.Fred (talk) 02:59, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:28, 11 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 04:52, 18 October 2011 (UTC)




 * Keep A very well cited stub article, could be salvaged and expanded, no reason to delete. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 18:55, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Congruent with WP:GNG—, . Northamerica1000 (talk) 05:42, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Small mention in various places, adds up to notability.  And aren't some of the awards its won notable?    D r e a m Focus  00:33, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.