Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReWire

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. Joyous 03:44, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)

ReWire
Non-notable software technology. Too close to an ad. LostCluster 02:47, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Strong keep, notable audio protocol. iMeowbot~Mw 03:06, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete poor software review with no information about the technology. Could potentially be expanded, but this isn't encyclopedic. - Amgine 06:40, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Comment: Deletion policy is clear that such articles should be cleaned up, not deleted. iMeowbot~Mw 11:32, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, appears to be notable. &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 11:25, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep for reasons stated above, but clean-up and expansion needed to make it sound less like an ad. 23skidoo 23:57, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, could do with expansion and more specifics on the technical aspects of the software. Megan1967 01:30, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, but NPOV and clean --Is Mise le Méas, Irishpunktom 11:01, Dec 31, 2004 (UTC)
 * Marginal keep. GRider\talk 18:26, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, no apparent reason for deletion. Dan100 11:58, Jan 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keeeeep. Andre ( talk ) 21:33, Jan 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. chocolateboy 15:22, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.