Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reaction Time


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:19, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Reaction Time
A strange combination of a dicdef and an ad for a company of little note with a link to a website that does not exist (while the url with the .com.au ending is probably a typo, the site does not exist at .au and the .com location is completely unrelated). Indrian 08:49, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: .com.au is a valid TLD in Australia, just this one doesn't happen to exist. Stifle 23:34, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, dictionary definition (!) and advertisement. Mat334 08:52, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete obviously a spam attempt --Mecanismo 10:22, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Movementarian 10:51, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 16:43, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and create fresh redirect to Reaction time. Protect if needed. &mdash;  F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( TALK )  18:39, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CORP. Turnstep 15:42, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Stifle 23:34, 11 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.