Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reactionary justice warrior


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GABgab 15:06, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Reactionary justice warrior

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication that this is a notable pejorative term. I could find exactly zero reliable sources discussing it when I performed a search. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  03:24, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. No sources have been provided other than a definition from Urban Dictionary, which is not considered a reliable source. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. — Paleo  Neonate  – 04:23, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. — Paleo  Neonate  – 04:24, 13 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Somewhat like Social justice warrior's sinister side I suppose? Except the major difference RJW is a pejorative without any reliable sources to attest to any degree of notability.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 04:57, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Urban dictionary not really a reliable source, and I also can't find mentions of the phrase anywhere online. - Owlsmcgee (talk) 05:49, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Sadly no one really uses this term and Urban Dictionary is far from reliable.  The Ninja5 Empire  ( Talk ) 07:05, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. I hope this does catch on in the future, because it's clearly a useful term for a very real phenomenon, but Wikipedia isn't the place to make that happen — it has to catch on first and then the Wikipedia article will follow, not vice versa. Bearcat (talk) 22:26, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable neologism; the only source is Urban Dictionary. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 16:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NEO.E.M.Gregory (talk) 09:37, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.