Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReadPlease


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of screen readers. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:51, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

ReadPlease

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Greatly fails GNG. No assertion of notability independent of the official website or download pages. — Mythdon ( talk  •  contribs ) 23:40, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Thanks,L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  00:52, 13 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails the GNG Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊  00:53, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:04, 13 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete: I added one reference and there are some mentions of this product relative to other similar assistive technologies, but I don't see sufficient to establish notability of this particular product beyond the list at List_of_screen_readers. AllyD (talk) 12:51, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List_of_screen_readers, where it is mentioned. The ref AllyD found is enough verifiability to be worth the mention at List_of_screen_readers and it seems like a plausible search term. -- 18:33, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above since there is at least one quality source discussing the subject. Bharatiya  29  14:08, 16 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.