Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reader's fatigue


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Cel e stianpower háblame 13:27, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Reader's fatigue
Nah dont do it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.136.48.238 (talk • contribs) 03:16, 23 October 2005 (UTC) While there is a link to a BBC online article see the phrase is used in relation to reading all of the Booker Prize shortlist in a short time so it contradicts the article's contention that it relates to reading amateur writing. Capitalistroadster 05:52, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was incomplete. Listing now.  No opinion. &mdash;Cryptic (talk) 05:13, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as neologism. Most of the prominent searches are Wikipedia and mirrors see
 * Delete as per Capitalistroadster's comment --Qirex 07:48, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete not a neologism, but the article is a) dicdef, and b) self-explanatory from title. --MacRusgail 17:16, 23 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.