Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reading Borough Council police and crime commissioner election, 2012


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete both. Secret account 04:26, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Reading Borough Council police and crime commissioner election, 2012

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

These articles are not about the full elections but the result in just one of many districts that were combined for the vote. Localised figues only exist because of the way the count was done. There's no need for a plethora of local breakdowns and the information is covered by England and Wales Police and Crime Commissioner elections, 2012 and South East England (European Parliament constituency) respectively. Timrollpickering (talk) 15:33, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete both Pointless articles - the results from Reading are meaningless as they are not the entire constituency for either of the elected posts. Number   5  7  13:21, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 12 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete both – even though the results are not entirely meaningless, as they show how electors in that area voted on that day, which is of some psephological interest.  It would be nice for each European electoral region (which en.Wikipedia calls "constituencies") to have the results by council area in the style of United_States_presidential_election,_2012 or fr:Résultats détaillés de l'élection présidentielle française de 2012.  But I don't suppose anyone is going to collect the information so let's delete the two anomalous Reading pages. Sussexonian (talk) 09:15, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Too provincial in notability. That none of the people named in the article have articles of their own is telling. --BDD (talk) 18:35, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.