Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Readspeaker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (WP:NPASR). N ORTH A MERICA 1000 21:04, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Readspeaker

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turns up how-to articles and company PR, but no significant independent coverage Dialectric (talk) 16:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 16:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * keep looks to be widely used. A quick search turned up [] [] and []. Two US gov't sites and a major college use this software on their sites, and probably more. I think this imparts plenty of notability. Deunanknute (talk) 22:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 12:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 17:12, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.