Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reagan Dunn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:40, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Reagan Dunn

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is Reagan Dunn's professional resume, posted by his associates from his office at the King County Council. See this sockpuppet case for more background on that issue. Aside from huge COI concerns, this article is poorly written, and sourced only (and recently) to Dunn's official biography with the King County Council, which the officeholder provides for publication. It is highly POV and reads like propaganda for the candidate. Article would need to be completely rewritten to be encyclopedic and nonpromotional, but since a county councilmember isn't really notable, it probably won't be. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 20:46, 4 September 2008 (UTC) 
 * I agree. There could be enough sources to warrant WP:N, but we're looking at a Heymann Standard. Jeremiah (talk) 04:01, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:45, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, even after I edited it so the inline notes would actually show up, lacking in notability and sources. Richard Pinch (talk) 06:40, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN -- not notable enough by position, not enough third party reliable sources to satisfy the general notability criterion. RayAYang (talk) 08:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.