Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real-Time Innovations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:40, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Real-Time Innovations

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:CORP. Has a link but fails WP:CORPDEPTH as a routine notices of a move. A google search reviels press releases and merely trivial coverage or mentions. Hu12 (talk) 05:54, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 09:35, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 09:35, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 09:35, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 09:35, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete clear fail of WP:CORPDEPTH per nom. Logical Cowboy (talk) 14:06, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not appear to meet the notability criteria for companies at this time. --MelanieN (talk) 15:33, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Seems to be a significant vendor in its areas of speciality, but not a lot of coverage found. GNews only has press releases. GBooks has a few mentions such as, , , , . --Michig (talk) 09:08, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.