Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real Big Prawn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete. --Cel e stianpower háblame 23:00, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

Real Big Prawn
Speedy Delete per nomination. Creator removed db-nonsense tag I placed on page. It appears to be nothing but "unfinished" nonsense - if the non-verifiability with Google is not enough to go by, then surely the title of the page is. LichYoshi 13:44, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

Redirect to Dendrobranchiata. Bjelleklang -  talk 13:59, 1 November 2005 (UTC) SPEEDY DELETE Stu 15:14, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong delete nonsense jnothman talk 14:07, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete for all reasons above. PJM 15:28, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, per nom. -Andrew 16:07, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Dendrobranchiata, per User:Bjelleklang. Maybe a neologism, maybe a hoax, but certainly not nonsense.  Not speedyable. --fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 17:25, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Dendrobranchiata is a serious look at the species. Really big prawns is nonsense however you look at it. Not even a redirect. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 17:39, 1 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete under category A1 - an article with little or no context. A Google search shows that it is not a term in regular use see . Capitalistroadster 17:58, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.  . Capitalistroadster 18:04, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, just because author removed speedy tag is no reason to AfD it instead... it's still speedy for nonsense IMO.--Isotope23 22:01, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, just because author removed speedy tag is no reason to AfD it instead... it's still speedy for nonsense IMO.--Isotope23 22:01, 1 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.