Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real estate in Italy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) &mdash; kikichugirl  speak up! 06:09, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Real estate in Italy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't think this is a stand-alone Wikipedia page. There is nothing of substance in this article. Aaekia (talk) 08:49, 22 February 2015 (UTC) This article is a standard used by several nations, we have similar articles as "Real estate in ....", and is connected with other models and templates. The information is still incomplete, but there are already numerous artistic and historical references that are necessary to understand the nature of the real estate market in Italy today. In the article there will be references to the state of the current of real estate market, probably accompanied by numerous tables containing data. All data will be referenced by business newspapers. Since the topic is very complex articulated it takes a bit of time to complete it. I do not consider acceptable the cancellation of this article, also because the topic very relevant and inserted in WikiProject Italy. Roberto73c (talk) 19:53, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 23 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - there are many 'reliable' sources for this topic, they just need filling in. Jonpatterns (talk) 10:28, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep & Improve – There are lots of improvements needed, but all are attainable and normal for a fledgling article. —&#160;&#160; &#160;&#160;Bill W.&#160;&#160;  &#160;&#160; (Talk)&#160;&#160;(Contrib)&#160;&#160; (User:Wtwilson3) &#160;&#160;— 20:27, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable plus contains a lot of OR right now. Mrfrobinson (talk) 11:37, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment my apologies to the creator of this article. I believe the reason user:Mrfrobinson has shown up in this discussion is because he is stalking most of my edits. Ottawahitech (talk) 02:51, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.