Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reality porn

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 01:21, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)

Reality porn
Tagged for deletion last night by anon 198.70.89.43 with comment "very short, pointless text". No vote on my part at this time. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 12:48, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup, expand. I've heard the term. It's a huge trend in the porn industry right now. --InShaneee 16:34, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * The porn industry's response to reality TV? Eh, sounds plausable.  Google backs it up, 755,000+ for "reality porn", the first page of hits dedicated to this sub-genre. Keep. humblefool&reg; 21:53, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as a legitimate subgenre, not to mention a dominant Internet-based industry. Needs major expansion. It's possible that "reality porn" may be synonymous with "gonzo porn" which is addressed in the article gonzo, so maybe some sort of merge and redirect might be in order, too. 23skidoo 03:28, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep but does need expanding. Ollie 16:14, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.