Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ream (email client)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies.  A  Train talk 09:22, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Ream (email client)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable and contains little if any encyclopedic content. Fails Wikipedia's General notability guideline. Lacks referencing, so the article seems to be completely original research WP:OR. Lack of referencing also means that is violates WP:V. FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 17:49, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- This is the same argument as wp:Articles_for_deletion/Courier_(email_client). Time to go. Rhadow (talk) 19:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:50, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:50, 7 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.