Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reaped


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  13:47, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Reaped

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I found zero significant coverage for this film. No one that had a part in the film has an article. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 23:50, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 3 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. It appears to be a homemade short film. Cute, but it doesn't pass WP:MOVIE. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:25, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Tokyogirl79
 * Comment. Is in the IMDb, but I cannot find sufficient independent coverage on it. MakeSense64 (talk) 13:02, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. I also notice that this article was created by a one-time editor, so a possible case of self promotion. MakeSense64 (talk) 13:09, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. The thing about IMDB is that a lot of films can get added that have dubious or no notability, which is why it's considered to be a trivial source. Users can add movies into the database and while they do have requirements for adding, I'm honestly not sure how much checking they actually do as far as the various requirements go or how far those requirements can be stretched.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 17:59, 3 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * IMDB does not care anything about "notable". They simply require that a film being added can be confirmed by their staff as having screened publically somewhere, and even a minor film festival can be enough. It can however, be a good jumping off point for advanced searches.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:45, 3 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Short film that did not receive coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:NF and WP:GNG.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:56, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.