Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rear vacuum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedily deleted (G12) by Fastily. Non-admin closure. Deor (talk) 05:48, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Rear vacuum

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:OR. Sp33dyphil © • © 23:07, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 15 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Exact copy of http://www.gmecca.com/byorc/dtipsaerodynamics.html, so it is a copyright infringement, but not original research. So, unfortunately, speedy delete. But, I am surprised that this concept is missing from WP. Not a big deal, but it is a central part of strategy in car racing, maybe best know as "vacuum cone"? I'll sure mark it is something that should be created soon - Nabla (talk) 01:09, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete It's called Drafting (aerodynamics). I can only find a single reference that refers to it as "rear vacuum", and even there not intending to introduce it as a term, but rather just using it descriptively. EEng (talk) 03:03, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.