Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reardonesque


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Carioca 00:12, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Reardonesque

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unverifiable through reliable sources, doesn't seem to be a notable neologism. Nothing useful from Google. Wafulz 02:25, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no sources showing notability of this neologism, even in the rock climbing community. NawlinWiki 02:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and NawlinWiki. Perhaps people are using the term, but it doesn't seem to have caught on. FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 03:08, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NEO that fails WP:V and probably speedyable as WP:ATP. --Dhartung | Talk 03:26, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Since it's probably made up in summer 2007, it's definitely a neologism that is WP:NFT. In fact, it's currently used only in forums, as I check, so it's not widespread enough to be metioned by reliable sources like newspapers.--Alasdair 05:23, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. --PhilipO 21:28, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a common neologism and no evidence of widespread usage --User:Allezlesrouges —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 23:24, 28 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.