Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reason components


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Merge all to Reason (program), except ReCycle (program), which should be renominated. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-11 01:32Z 

Reason (program) components


I'm crunching this huge list of nominations together into one to make them more cohesive. They're basically all stubs on (apparently non-notable) components of Reason (program), and are almost guaranteed to all meet the same fate. This just makes discussion easier. (|--  UlT i MuS 


 * Merge to Reason (program) as it seems to be part of that program. -- Whpq 17:06, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to Reason (program). It's notable, but not on its own. (|--   UlT i MuS  18:01, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge per Ultimus - no evidence of multiple non-trivial coverage in third-party sources to merit its own article per WP:SOFTWARE.  Wal  ton  Vivat Regina!  18:02, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SPAM. This seems more aimed to selling the product than any other factor.  RGTraynor 17:38, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - only link is to their own site; no evidence of multiple non-trivial coverage in independent sources to establish notability per WP:SOFTWARE. Delete unless sources are added by the end of this AfD. Wal  ton  Vivat Regina!  18:00, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete although I see the value in merging these articles, because they are all part of the Reason (program), I feel if they are merged, it will cause that article to be even bigger mess than it already is, and then we'll have to deal with getting that cleaned up. Betaeleven 20:31, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Unbundle and Keep ReCycle (program), but Merge others. Recycle is a stand-alone, shipped-separately application that is produced by the makers of Reason, but is not part of the same package. It is notable in its own right as a loop editing and "beat-slicing" app. The information in the remaining articles is useful and a careful merge would help the main article, but deletion wouldn't be a disaster. --Mike C | talk 14:15, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps I should have made it clearer, but Reason (program) isn't up for deletion here (it's not in the list). It's pretty obviously notable. The question is whether the seperate components are. (|--   UlT i MuS  17:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Confused Reason with ReCycle. My bad, comment is irrelevant. (|--   UlT i MuS  17:08, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to Reason (program). If the merge is performed, the issue of notability raised by 2 editors supporting "delete" becomes moot.  Notability applies to the subject of an article in its entirety and not to individual sections of an article.  -- Black Falcon 08:24, 10 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.