Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reasonable Doubt: Bizarre Tales of Death & Justice


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Reasonable Doubt: Bizarre Tales of Death & Justice

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I could find no notability for this book per WP:BK. SL93 (talk) 22:31, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 22:35, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The log of April 1 is overfilled
 * Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. I could not find any reviews or articles discussing the book in my searches for sources. The book fails Notability. Cunard (talk) 04:51, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NBOOK; I cannot find significant coverage of the book in reviews, newspaper articles etc., and it has not won any awards as far as I can see. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:40, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 14:17, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:15, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:15, 3 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.