Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reasons to Be Cheerful (book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Sources identified by ARandomName123 establish notability.  Malinaccier ( talk ) 00:17, 11 June 2024 (UTC)  Malinaccier  ( talk ) 00:17, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Reasons to Be Cheerful (book)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Mainly Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV, I had trouble finding sources for this article. GoodHue291 (talk) 23:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can only find reviews of a book with the same title by Nina Stibbe, unrelated to this book. I don't see notability for this book. Oaktree b (talk) 23:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Visual arts,  and United Kingdom.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  02:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Covered in the New York Times, The Independent (via ProQuest), Eye Magazine and Design Oberserver. Not sure about the reliability of the last one, but the author seems qualified enough. Sufficient coverage to meet WP:NBOOK. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 03:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Could be excellent sources, but it's still hasn't been added onto the article. GoodHue291 (talk) 22:22, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @GoodHue291: I've added them to the article, but for future reference, whether they're in the article or not has no impact on notability. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 23:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * It's still a very short article to be notable on Wikipedia. GoodHue291 (talk) 12:09, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The length of the article isn't relevant to notability either. Check out WP:SURMOUNTABLE. More sentences can be added to the article through normal editing; if it bothers you, feel free to expand the article. Toughpigs (talk) 15:40, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: The New York Times source is very strong. The Eye Magazine is also good. Toughpigs (talk) 03:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep, per above listing of sources (please do well-detailed and extensive "before" searches if AfD is to be a thing). Randy Kryn (talk) 08:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep, per above sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.