Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Šramková


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:49, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Rebecca Šramková

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Player does not meet tennis notability guidelines: No wta main draw or fed cup appearances, has not won any ITF tournaments above the $25,000 category and has no notable junior career. Had been proposed via PROD but tag was removed by IP editor with no reason given. Fazzo29 (talk) 02:00, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  02:10, 24 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Doesn't meet the guideline criteria, or GNG. Mostly mentions in results lists, or database entries. – Margin1522 (talk) 09:55, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

This deletion is a nonsense, but no problem, she is in few weeks relevant. :o --Nina.Charousek (talk) 12:54, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 24 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Doesn't meet the WPTENNIS notability criteria or GNG. Article can be temporarily copied to a user page if the expectation is that she will become notable soon. --Wolbo (talk) 12:23, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete – No indication of notability. Does not pass WP:GNG. — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 14:49, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NTENNIS. A lifetime best ranking of 540 is a long way from being notable and the only references do not show significant coverage.204.126.132.231 (talk) 21:23, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.