Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Brown (Beckie0)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:08, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Rebecca Brown (Beckie0)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Having several views/subscribers on YouTube is not a good claim to notability. Not enough coverage in reliable sources, though if there are any, I may have missed them given that there is another person with the same name. Possible COI as well. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:38, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Non-Deletion Do not delete Article due to outside sources that state that is she an actress. However, the Fan base commentary should be deleted. Arman Cagle ( Contact me EMail Me  Contribs ) 12:42, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable youtube speaker. self-promotional autobiography suspected since article subject, Rebecca Brown (Beckie0) is identified in the article and title as going by the name BeckieO ("becky oh") and the original writer is user: Beckieoh. The user has only written about BeckieO/Rebecca Brown and also about trichotillomaniahe (nervous hair-pulling), which is the subject BeckieO vlogs about. this self-promotion reads like an advert. no sources except for her own youtubes. Cramyourspam (talk) 14:20, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy A7 not notable, only has self-published sources. Bazj (talk) 15:57, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per Bazj. --Sammy1339 (talk) 22:38, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD as there is no assertion of notability and no independent sources.-- danntm T C 04:57, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 3 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Refs are useless. Szzuk (talk) 06:17, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BIO and lacks independent sources.Could be deleted under A7 Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:05, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.