Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Eynon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Rebecca Eynon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm unsure about notability here, tending towards "lacking". Basically the only criterion that could be applied here is number of cites (GNG, honours, positions do not rise to anything special in our sense of the word), and that features one big whopper and a number of good ones. I don't feel this is sufficient, it's probably a bit of a judgement call. Please assess. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:44, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:44, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * All right, this is looking pretty solid. Giving it another 12 h and then withdrawing if no dissenting opinion. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 00:23, 18 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. I've trimmed a lot of badly-sourced fluff from the article. I couldn't find enough book reviews for WP:AUTHOR, but her heavy citations on Google Scholar look like a pass of WP:PROF to me. There's also a weaker case for #C8 as one of three editors-in-chief of a journal from one of the major commercial publishers (despite the fact that we don't have a separate article for the journal yet). —David Eppstein (talk) 21:05, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * On a completely unrelated note - these textbooks retail for more than a thousand dollars!!? No wonder students end up with 100k student loan debts. Holy mackerel. (Thanks for the review ref) -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:45, 17 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. Clear pass of WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC).
 * Keep. Top-cited paper with over 1000 citations + several other that are quite respectable in citations certainly looks like WP:NPROF C1. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 23:23, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:43, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:44, 18 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.