Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Haynes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:57, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Rebecca Haynes

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Being a (senior) university lecturer and author of the odd published work does not equate to notability. -- Cain Mosni (talk||contribs) 15:38, 23 June 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:52, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 05:56, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. This page does report her as head of the history department, though it is certainly unusual for a "senior lecturer" to hold such a position, as this level is below "reader" and "professor" in the British academic system. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 20:19, 25 June 2010 (UTC).
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Weak delete in the absence of evidence of passing WP:PROF. Department head isn't enough, and I don't see enough citations in Google scholar to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF #1. (I'm not convinced Google scholar is the right place to look for those citations, given her field, but if they were there then they should have shown up in higher numbers.) —David Eppstein (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.