Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Javeleau Birthday Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 02:54, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Rebecca Javeleau Birthday Party

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Bringing this to AfD after I declined a speedy giving as its reason "Why is this here?". I didn't this was a valid CSD reason, but thought the question merited further discussion. There has been a failed attempt to bring this to AfD previously. Peridon (talk) 18:19, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. No notability whatsoever. --bender235 (talk) 18:22, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - while it got a fair amount of coverage, there isn't any hint so far that this WP:EVENT holds lasting significance - frankieMR (talk) 18:57, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - As per nom, and what my fellow wiki mates said above, it has not enough notability and relevance to have an article here in wikipedia. Eduemoni↑talk↓  19:26, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  -- Acather96 (talk) 19:54, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- Acather96 (talk) 19:55, 11 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete or merge. I think I remember this one being in the news at the time, but a GNews search puts virtually all of the coverage in the immediate aftermath of the event, which doesn't really meet WP:EVENT. Should someone find an article that covers controversy over Facebook-based parties, however, the article would be appropriate there. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 21:15, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:19, 12 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete, ultimately a case of WP:NOTNEWS, with a brief spike in coverage around that time, with no evidence of actual encyclopedic notability. At best this might be worth a half-sentence mention at an article about criticism of Facebook, but only if that can be sourced. -- Kinu <sup style="color:red;">t /<sub style="color:red;">c  19:44, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.