Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Loos

Rebecca Loos was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Keep - no consensus to delete - sent to cleanup

If this article told me something about Loos and why she did what she did, I might feel it worth having. As it is, it adds nothing that is not in David Beckham. The nature of celebrity is such that I suspect nobody will expand this in the future Cutler 09:48, Aug 6, 2004 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * I suspect she will be publishing a book soon, perhaps offer to cleanup? Alternatively redirect to David Beckham Dunc_Harris|&#9786; 10:50, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Comment: What should we offer to cleanup, the book, the affair or the article? They all seem worthy but thankless tasks... (-> No vote, no real damage either way IMO. Andrewa 22:57, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Send to clean up. She's famous.  It won't last, but we have to decide based on the present, I guess. Geogre 13:47, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Either clean up or add a section about her on the David Beckham article. Darksun 17:46, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Making international headlines, even if for being a twerp, makes you notable. Cleanup if necessary. Ambi 13:25, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. Nothing I see that's worth cleaning up. If she publishes the book and if it becomes notable, then she might deserve more than the one line in David Beckham.  Rossami 13:39, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with Rossami; making int'l headlines on someone else's coattails entitles you to a mention in their article, not necessarily your own.  And there's not much more to say about her. +sj +  16:15, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with Rossami and Sj. - Ta bu shi da yu 03:39, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sufficiently notable that people might come by having heard the name and not knowing who she is. Ian Maxwell 04:44, 2004 Aug 12 (UTC)
 * Redir to the Beckham article--it already mentions the allegation, and the fact he denied it. She warrants no more coverage than that (unless/until she publishes a book or whatever). Niteowlneils 14:12, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)