Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Love


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:35, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Rebecca Love

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails: WP:GNG   WP:PORNBIO

Vanity page... WP:SPIP PeterWesco (talk) 09:28, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:10, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 14 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Concur: delete: WP:PORNBIO sets out very specific criteria, and Ms. Love does not meet any of them. — Francophonie&#38;Androphilie  (Je vous invite à me parler ) 10:10, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. It grieves me to have to say this, but, very unfortunately, this hardworking girl does not yet meet the stringent, exacting, and often sublime standards of WP:PORNBIO. Qworty (talk) 10:19, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails PORNBIO with a single scene-related award nomination. A search for reliable sources yielded a single AVN article, not enough for GNG. • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BLP requirements. There is not one independent source listed in the article since both the references are based on the subject.
 * http://www.universal-ent.net/rebecca_love.htm refers to the the subject in the first person "me".
 * http://www.rebeccalove.com/about.html is her web site.
 * as this is an unsuitably sourced BLP it should be immediately deleted.
 * if these sources were to be considered authoritative however than the subject fails WP:GNG as well as WP:PORNBIO BO &#124; Talk 01:51, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.