Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Renner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:49, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Rebecca Renner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is essential a CV written almost entirely by two single purpose accounts (Additionally, subject has asked Twitter followers to "help" after it was previously deleted via WP:PROD). Subject doesn't appear to meet WP:CREATIVE; no third-party sources about the writer; rather, just links to articles she has written. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:11, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 16:49, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 16:49, 17 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete There is a Rebecca Renner who wrote several often cited science articles in the 80s, but, from this Rebecca Renner's website, this isn't her. For this Ms. Renner, there are no secondary sources that talk about her at all. Aurornisxui (talk) 20:45, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete youngish writer who has published articles but about whom I cannot find coverage. Fails WP:SIGCOV.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:06, 18 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete promotional piece. Anatoliatheo (talk) 12:16, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:58, 21 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete, promo piece. Trivial and Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Fails GNG guidelines as to notability for a stand alone article. Kierzek (talk) 02:06, 21 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.