Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Riots (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) w umbolo   ^^^  20:45, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Rebecca Riots (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails the notability guideline for musicians and bands and the general notability guideline due to a lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources.  SITH   (talk)   20:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep as has reliable sources coverage such as an Allmusic biography by a professional staff member together with an independent album review which normally indicates that more reliable sources are available. Have not checked for additional sources yet, have you seen this list of WikiProject Albums/Sources where you can see which sources are reliable and independent and those which are not ?Atlantic306 (talk) 20:56, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * , I am aware of the procedure for AllMusic sources however on its own it definitely doesn't constitute passage of WP:BAND. I have searched for additional sources and found nothing.    SITH   (talk)   23:18, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * There are more results using the search term "Rebecca Riots" (band) instead of the "Rebecca Riots (band)" term used in the search links above, some are irrelevant but there are some that look promising and remember google and it's algorithms are not the be all and end all, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 00:09, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. There is further coverage in reliable sources:, , , . --Michig (talk) 08:07, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Week keep: Per "User talk:Michig's" sources. I can see "some" notability more than just the two sources on the article provide. Most of the "History" and all of the "Activism" section needs to go or be sourced as this is a BLP related article. Not sure what "building with straw bale" means unless literal. I did learn a little. I had never heard of "Afro-Celtic style", "Afro-Celtic Funk", or "Afro-Celtic bluegrass" before. Otr500 (talk) 07:01, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I found some other sources and added them. There's enough to pass GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 04:58, 25 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.