Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Stevens


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-27 05:48Z 

Rebecca Stevens

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Subject of article does not meet guidelines for notibility per WP:BIO. Nv8200p talk 04:20, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sources can be found to indicate that the subject is notable. janejellyroll 04:46, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No claim of notability. WP:COI issues also.  -Selket Talk 04:52, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Did anyone notice that the article was written by 'Lauri Stevens'? It seems to be promotion from someone with a conflict of interest. If the closing admin deletes Rebecca Stevens, I suggest that he or she also deal with the orphaned image [[Image:Img 8365.jpg]] either by deletion or IfD. - Richardcavell 04:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Yeah seems to be COI. Not really notable unless her plays have good media coverage, which wasn't shown.--Dacium 06:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - defeinte WP:COI issues with the article. Credits appear to be community theatre.  Claims of TV and film roles unsubstantiated, witrh no IMDB entry. Faile WP:V. -- Whpq 13:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, a totally unsourced and unreferenced article about a living person leaves no choice. Change to Weak Keep is sources are added by end of this AfD Alf photoman 13:57, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability is only regional. It also looks like promotion


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.