Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebel Girls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The problem was with the article creator who has been blocked appropriately by an Admin. Now asides that, the article does indeed have at least 3 solid sources that substantiates notability of article’s subject (non-admin closure) Celestina007 (talk) 07:39, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Rebel Girls

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The organization in itself does not possess WP:CORPDEPTH & falls short of WP:CORP as the organization lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Perharps a case of WP:TOOSOON. Celestina007 (talk) 23:26, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn By Nominator
 * Per rationale provide by my senior colleague @. I would go ahead to speedy keep as I can’t see any opposing !vote.


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:26, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:26, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:26, 17 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep - In the spirit of full disclosure, I am the administrator who blocked the editor who wrote this article. I blocked for COI edits and a username indicating shared use. But the article already contains sufficient references to establish the notability of the publishing company, and the article is not written in an excessively promotional way. The article should be kept and the nominator (or any other editor) should edit the article to improve its neutrality. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  00:30, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Lots of references including a good article from The Guardian as an independent reliable source.Hughesdarren (talk) 03:36, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep The sourcing is adequate enough to establish notability.TH1980 (talk) 05:25, 18 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.