Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebel Pundit (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Rebel Pundit
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable and apparently-defunct political blog which was briefly mentioned in a couple right-wing sources once upon a time but hasn't had anything posted in more than a year; traffic and Alexa rank have cratered into the 5 million range. Doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG. Previous AfD (three years ago) was closed as no consensus. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 14:42, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:02, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:03, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:04, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:04, 10 October 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲 水 07:22, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Morgan Ginsberg (talk) 22:54, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears to be a defunct website that was really only notable for one video it produced. I know there's a one event policy for individuals and I'm assuming that's also true for organizations. If I'm wrong about that then change my vote to keep because that video did get coverage from multiple sources.Sandals1 (talk) 15:00, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: searches suggest that significant coverage in independent, reliable sources sufficient to meet the notability guideline for web-specific content are not found. Sam Sailor 13:36, 24 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.