Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebel Waltz Recording Co.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:33, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Rebel Waltz Recording Co.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Being previously de-PRODed (especially a decade ago) is no reason to de-PROD. This is a non-notable recording studio. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:51, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Almost no coverage at all, and at that, the only mentions I can find at all are related only to Gwen Stefani.  --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 11:23, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:14, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:14, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:14, 2 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as there is literally no actual substance, simply explaining the basic words about the company, but there's especially no actual convincing, no convincing information or sources, nothing to suggest an acceptable article therefore otherwise. SwisterTwister   talk  01:48, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete uncited corporate essay on a non notable subject. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:08, 8 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.