Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reber


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  01:42, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Reber

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

There doesn't seem to be anything notable about this name that would justify an entire article. D•g Talk to me/What I've done 03:10, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are a few Rebers on Wikipedia, this could give basic information about the surname and link to those articles. [tk]   XANDERLIPTAK  06:17, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Or, alternatively, we could have the article that was originally here before it was hijacked. &#9786; Uncle G (talk) 09:58, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't the name of that company be something like Reber Automobile? And it closed over ne hundred years ago after being open for only a year, hardly the first thing that comes to mind for Reber. I can't even Find Reber as a car manufacture in Google easily, but create an article under the actual company name and add a link to it from the Reber article. [tk]   XANDERLIPTAK  01:15, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It's not a company. It's an automobile, and its name, as you can find by looking it up in Georgano and Andersen's New encyclopedia of motorcars (ISBN 9780525932543) is the Reber. Uncle G (talk) 06:04, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * per Uncle G, restore original article. If there's consensus to keep the current content -- and why not? there are plenty of other articles about individual surnames -- create a new article "Reber (surname)" and disambig. Jimmy Pitt   talk  13:28, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Strange nomination. Valid as both an article and as a dab page. i've recreated the original at Reber (automobile). This should now serve as a dab page I think. Dr. Blofeld 15:48, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.