Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebound therapy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 10:53, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Rebound therapy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article reads like promotional literature and is not reliably sourced. Worse the notability of the topic is highly questionable. Dusty |&#x1f4ac;|You can help! 16:07, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. I support deletion of this article. I could be convinced otherwise only if a properly sourced version were to replace this one. The current version relies inordinately upon an obviously biased site (http://www.reboundtherapy.org) and the primary author of this page is affiliated with that site. (He is a Course Tutor and Consultant at Rebound Therapy UK, the organisation sponsoring this advertisement.)
 * Comment - There are better versions in the history, those that Paul V Kaye didn't edit and an IP editor had changed it to. They are more general articles rather than dealing with the focused commercial trademark program that the article is currently showing, which is also probably a mass of copyright violations at the same time. Canterbury Tail   talk  16:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you CT for your comment. If there is a better version can we revert to it? In the meantime, I am still in support of deletion. This is because of the reasons stated above as well as the fact that the name is currently the topic of a legal dispute in the UK (apparently--I read this here on a WP talk page and have not read any news accounts or other supporting sources). If it turns out that the lower-case "rebound therapy" tag is found to be the IP of Rebound Therapy UK then we will have to delete or rename the page to avoid a copyright violation. Peace,  Dusty |&#x1f4ac;|You can help! 17:34, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:41, 27 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - Spam. Trash. Deep-six it. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 20:43, 27 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. There does not appear to be sufficient independent sources to indicate notability.  Peacock (talk) 23:01, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Reads like spam, sounds like spam. Must be spam. I see nothing indicating notability Cabe  6403  (Talk•Sign) 08:47, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clear advertising on behalf of Paul V Kaye. –  Richard  BB  12:09, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.