Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebound tockey ball


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per WP:SNOW. J.delanoy gabs adds 07:09, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Rebound tockey ball

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not for things made in school one day - this was made up one day "from the humble hotel tennis courts of cairns, Qld." Wongm (talk) 06:03, 24 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NFT. -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 06:05, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I had previously added a PROD to this article, and it was removed without explanation or improvement. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:17, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: seems to be a hoax. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 10:03, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFT, and a lack of any indication of notability. It would be WP:CSD-able if it were in one of the allowed categories. Anomie⚔ 12:40, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Just so you know this is a real sport not made up at school my local tockeyball club (the komodorihno's) is reigning champions  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.211.77.34 (talk) 00:08, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * How could you prove that? Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 02:39, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * how could you prove its not a real sport —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.211.77.34 (talk) 09:59, 25 September 2008 (UTC)  — 123.211.77.34 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. If there are no reliable sources to indicate the existence (and encylopedia-worthiness) of the topic, Wikipedia does not include it. Anomie⚔ 11:50, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't bother trying to reason with that one, he's been going around vandalizing userpages of half the people who have voted here. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:28, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It didn't hurt to give him the benefit of the doubt. Anomie⚔ 02:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:27, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * And I just had to replace the AfD template on the article. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:34, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note — There might also be sockpuppetry issues as well (see User:Bigtuna101), as many of the edits look very much alike. MuZemike (talk) 05:14, 26 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.