Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebtel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. WjBscribe 22:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Rebtel

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Procedural listing. An anon user,  has been posting messages on this page suggesting it may be primarily intended to promote this company, and from a cursory examination, it may fail notability guidelines. Listing here to get a broader consensus. &mdash;dgies tc 18:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - reads like advertising. Also, most of the links are to sites affiliated with the company, so no evidence of multiple non-trivial coverage in independent sources to establish notability per WP:CORP. Delete unless appropriate sources are added by the end of this AfD. Wal  ton  Vivat Regina!  18:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. Could use some more information, but it has been mentioned by USA Today and Reuters UK. flod logic 18:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete In spite of the USA today article. This is the attempt of an individual company to hijack VOIP and its derivatives, a much more general technology, discussed in dozens of articles, by calling it be its own name. I see no evidence of more general use. DGG 03:46, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.