Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rec.music.white-power newsgroup vote


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 17:42, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Rec.music.white-power newsgroup vote

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find any reliable sources. Schuy m 1 ( talk ) 09:27, 19 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. There are no third party sources on this, its purely original research.  Violates all core Wikipedia policies in the worst of ways.  JBsupreme (talk) 10:01, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep for now. A search on Google Books shows a number of possible reliable sources to aid in meeting WP:V: see . Thus it should be possible to upgrade the article so that it meets Wikipedia policy. *** Crotalus *** 15:29, 19 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and WP:NOT. Even if reliable sources can be found, the subject in question seems to me to be of temporary notability and therefore does not warrant an article.Nrswanson (talk) 12:18, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.   -- raven1977 (talk) 05:05, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Nrswanson we are WP:NOT a newspaper nor are we a primary source of information.  coccyx bloccyx  (toccyx)  18:28, 21 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.